Published on Election Defense Alliance - public site (http://www.electiondefensealliance.org)

Citizen Activism Tools

Democracy is not for spectators. This is where you will find tools to help empower you, your friends and your fellow citizens take back control of our public election process.

Verified Voting Transparency Project: Election Monitoring Checklists

An election is a complex process that begins several weeks before Election Day and is not fully completed until several weeks after. To assure the integrity of the vote, citizens need to participate in observing all phases of the election process.

The "Election Transparency Project" is a set of election monitoring checklists for citizens to use before, during and after the election to assess how open to public verification their local election systems are. "Transparency" is one of six election assessment projects prepared by Verified Voting.org. The other project sets address Election Administration, Election Incidents, State/Local Organizing, Voting Information, and Voting Standards.

To access an index to the entire set of these invaluable election education resources, click here [1].

To download copies of each of the Transparency monitoring checklists, click on the blue hyperlinked titles below,
and check back for the forthcoming titles.

Election Transparency Project

OBSERVATION GUIDELINES AND QUESTIONNAIRES

We are preparing observation guidelines and questionnaires for six different aspects of the electoral process: you can choose those that best match your schedule and interests.

Some aspects of the electoral process can be easily observed by individuals. Others are more suited to a group effort. Both individuals and organizations are invited to participate. Please see the descriptions below for more information.

If you plan to observe but have not yet signed up, please click here to do so. After you register, we'll automatically send you questionnaires as they become available, and later, the webpage address of the online forms so you can submit your questionnaire results.

After you've registered, just download and print the instructions and questionnaires from this web site as they become available. The instructions and questionnaires will make clear exactly what you need to look for.

After observation, you can easily enter your observations and notes into a web-based survey form (we’ll send you the links), or send your hard copy questionnaire to us for entry.

The data you provide will be made publicly available – but not your name or any sensitive information. Data is redacted to prevent disclosure of personally identifying data (such as name or contact information).

If you take photographs or video, we'd love to have electronic copies of photos, video, and other media documentation. Please send all materials to observer@verifiedvoting.org [2] -- if you have questions about what or how to send to us, just send us your question at the same email address. Be sure to tell us exactly what, when and where events occurred so we can properly document your files.

CODE OF CONDUCT & CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

It is important to note that the Election Transparency Project is a non-partisan project designed to improve the electoral process and protect the right to vote. All project volunteers and staff must not disrupt the election process, and must not prevent poll workers or election officials from performing their legal duties. As an observer or volunteer in this project, it's essential that you observe all laws, rules and protocols of observation as required in your state and jurisdiction, and that you are respectful of anyone you encounter in carrying out any part of this project. It is also crucial that you refrain from wearing any buttons, t-shirts, hats or other attire which represent any political or partisan views whatsoever. Appropriate attire is recommended (e.g. business casual).

Additionally, in the course of conducting observation, volunteers may occasionally deal with sensitive personal data, e.g., personally identifiable information of persons who experienced or reported voting problems or irregularities. It is important that every staff member and volunteer adhere to the Election Transparency Project confidentiality statement, found here [see footnote below[1]].

As an observer, you will be asked to indicate when you submit your data that you understand and agree to the Election Transparency Project confidentiality agreement.

PRE-ELECTION QUESTIONNAIRES

1. ELECTION TRANSPARENCY SCORECARD - State [3] / Local [4] Grade your state and/or county’s level of openness and transparency! These questionnaires should be completed now, so that the grades are in before the election begins.

Transparency is an important part of achieving publicly verifiable elections. It’s also necessary for citizen observation, which is a crucial ingredient for free and fair elections. Use these questionnaires to identify obstacles to transparency so that they can be corrected before future elections.

Completing an Election Transparency Scorecard for your state and/or your local voting jurisdiction (county, parish, township) can be done over the course of several days, and can typically be done when your schedule permits, as long as you or someone in your group can make some phone calls to offices during business hours. However, for the project to be most effective, you or someone in your group must complete the Election Transparency Scorecard as soon as possible -- by mid-October at the latest. Participation in the transparency assessment can be undertaken on either an individual or a group basis.

If you enjoy learning more about election-related laws in your state and how they are applied locally, the transparency scorecard may be of particular interest to you.

We encourage everyone who will be observing one of the components listed below to also complete an Election Transparency Scorecard.

2. PRE-ELECTION TESTING QUESTIONNAIRE [5] You can use this questionnaire to collect critical information on the pre-election testing (often referred to as “Logic & Accuracy testing”) of the voting machines in your area! Equipment testing occurs well in advance of the election, so call your election department now to find out the date!

The laws governing such testing differ widely across election jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, observers are permitted and even encouraged to ask questions and make comments. In others, only silent observers of the tests are permitted. Our questionnaire is adaptable to any of these scenarios. Observing pre-election testing may take only a few hours of time, although the testing (and thus the observation) usually occurs during the business day. This questionnaire has two parts: the first part consists of questions you'll ask by phone before you attend the test, and the second part is for the day of the test. This observation can be undertaken on either an individual or a group basis.

If you enjoy the technical side of voting-related issues, then observation of Logic & Accuracy testing may be for you! A technical background is helpful, but not necessary.

Also, we encourage everyone who will be documenting this information to also complete the Election Transparency Scorecard - Local [6] version (described above).

Local: http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf [7]

State: http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardState.pdf [8]

3. EARLY VOTING / BALLOT ACCOUNTING QUESTIONNAIRE [9]
This questionnaire will assist you in observing the ballot accounting that takes place in some jurisdictions at the close of early voting sites during each day of early voting. At the time the early voting site closed for the day, poll workers should reconcile the number of votes cast with the number of voters checking in to vote.

This observation will take place prior to Election Day, during the period of early voting. Approximately 14 states do not offer early voting of any kind – so this project would not apply to you if you live in: AL, CT, DE, MA, MD, MI, MS, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, WA. Other states may offer either in-person absentee ballot drop-off, or actual early voting in person. For this project, we're interested in the latter. Note: the rules for observing this critical function vary from place to place. We've written an introduction and instructions to help you - read this document first!

One advantage of participating in observation of ballot accounting is that such observation usually takes place after business hours on early voting days, and therefore may be an after-hours commitment. (Note: some locations stagger hours from one day to the next, to maximize voting participation.) This observation is recommended for groups that can cover several (if not all) early voting sites in a county, parish, or township, but individual observation is also welcome. It is important to observe on each day of the early voting period.

This type of observation is not generally technical in nature, and is well-suited to a variety of interests.

Leading citizen groups such as the Miami-Dade Election Reform Coalition and the Voting Integrity Alliance of Tampa Bay are working hard to plan and implement early voting observation in parts of Florida. The more people that we have participating throughout the country, the more we will be able to compare and contrast various ways of implementing early voting.

Also, we encourage everyone who will be documenting this information to also complete the Election Transparency Scorecard - Local [10] Version (described above).

ELECTION DAY AND POST-ELECTION QUESTIONNAIRES

4. POLL CLOSING / BALLOT ACCOUNTING QUESTIONNAIRE: [Available soon.]
This questionnaire is similar to the early voting questionnaire, except that it involves observing ballot accounting (reconciling the number of voters checking in to vote with the number of votes actually cast) at the time of poll closing on Election Day only, rather than at the end of each day of early voting. The rules for observing this critical function vary from place to place.

One advantage of participating in observation of ballot accounting is that such observation takes place after business hours on Election Day, and therefore is a short-term, after-hours commitment. This observation is recommended for groups that can cover several (but not necessarily all) polling places in a county, parish, or township. However, observation by an individual at a single polling place is also useful. If you are planning to serve as a pollworker or election judge, you may be ideally positioned to capture the necessary information.

This type of observation is not generally technical in nature, and is well-suited to a variety of interests.

In 2004, this type of observation by a leading citizen group in Florida, the Miami-Dade Election Reform Coalition (MDERC), revealed a variety of discrepancies, including that the vote totals of one machine were accidentally uploaded three times into the certified count. MDERC's report, "Get It Right The First Time", was cited by the US Government Accountability Office. This is your opportunity to expand this important work into your local area.

Also, we encourage everyone who will be documenting this information to also complete the Election Transparency Scorecard - Local [11] Version (described above).

5. AUDIT OBSERVATION QUESTIONNAIRE: [Available soon.]
Mandatory random manual audits are essential to protecting the vote. These audits provide a way to verify that the electronic voting systems (either DRE voting machines or optical scan voting systems) are accurately recording and counting the votes. However, there are many unanswered questions about the best ways to implement audits.

If you live in an area that already requires both a voter-verified paper record and routine manual auditing, this is your chance to find out how those important tools are being implemented, and to collect information necessary to formulate best practices for future auditing. And if you live in Kentucky or Pennsylvania, where there is an audit requirement, but not all jurisdictions will have voter-verified paper records to audit, it will be of special interest to learn how audits are conducted.

This observation can be undertaken on either an individual or a group basis.

If you are interested in how the votes are accounted for and checked for accuracy after Election Day, then this is the observation for you!

To find out whether your state requires mandatory manual audits, please visit our [12].

Manual audit requirements in the states: http://www.verifiedvoting.org/downloads/ManualAudits-06-06.pdf [13]

Also, we encourage everyone who will be documenting this information to also complete the Election Transparency
- State [14] and/or Local [15] Version (described above).

6. DISABILITY ACCESS QUESTIONNAIRE: [Available soon.]
Verified Voting seeks to promote electoral reforms that will improve the transparency and accuracy of our voting process for all voters, while still preserving individual voters’ privacy and independence at the polls. One of the primary goals of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) was to ensure access to the voting process for persons with disabilities, and much new equipment has been deployed for that purpose.

However, as with transparency, the laws on the books for accessibility do not necessarily tell us how accessible the voting process is in practice. This is particularly true for this November, since for some jurisdictions, this is the first year in which they are using voting equipment which they obtained in order to meet HAVA’s accessibility requirement.

You can help determine the extent to which the voting process has been made accessible for persons with disabilities by filling out this questionnaire. In so doing, you’ll help identify improvements that need to be made for future elections.

Also, we encourage everyone who will be documenting this information to also complete the Election Transparency Scorecard - Local [16] Version (described above).

REMEMBER: In addition to completed questionnaires, Verified Voting welcomes detailed descriptions of unexpected problems and supporting material such as videotapes, photos, and the like. Electronic copy of multimedia documentation can be sent to observer@verifiedvoting.org [17].

After you submit your observations, we hope that you'll let us know what you found useful, confusing, or missing from the Election Transparency Project observation tools, or help us by making other suggestions for improving citizen oversight of our nation's voting systems. If you register as a volunteer, the web address for an online feedback form will automatically be emailed to you at the close of the project.

MAKE AN IMPACT!

On the basis of the data that you gather, Verified Voting will produce one or more reports that will feature recommendations for best practices geared toward increasing both the verifiability and accuracy of our elections.

By directly observing the electoral process, and documenting it alongside hundreds or thousands of other people nationwide, you help lay the foundation for a stronger democracy.

Our goal is to support improvement in the administration of our elections, and to create models for effective citizen observation.

Not signed up yet?

Act now! Don’t wait! Sign up here for the Election Transparency Project and build a stronger democracy!

[1] Verified Voting Foundation Election Transparency Project
Confidentiality Agreement

I am participating in this nonpartisan project to improve the electoral process, protect the right to vote, and ensure that every vote counts as intended by the voter. I understand that many individuals who report voting problems and irregularities might not do so if they were not assured that the information they provide will be kept confidential. I understand that project volunteers and staff are expected to keep personally identifiable information in strictest confidence. I agree not to discuss personally identifiable information of persons reporting a voting problem or irregularity with anyone other than appropriate Verified Voting staff and designated volunteers.

Download the Black Box Voting Citizen's Tool Kit

THIS TOOL KIT IS A DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FOR CITIZENS
Black Box Voting's full citizen's tool kit is now available in a single document. [18]

Citizens are concerned. They want to know what they can do. Here's your chance to get started on meaningful elections reform action that will make a real difference in November.

The above link contains all 20 stand-alone modules in one consolidated document
(make sure you have Adobe Acrobat installed to read the pdf files. You can download it for free. [19]

SIMPLE, EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO TAKE BACK YOUR ELECTIONS:
1. Pick any module.
2. Choose any action within the module.
3. Then just follow through on it.
4. Every action in the Tool Kit starts another pebble rolling down the hill.

NEW MODULE IS UP: Pertains to fundraising for local elections reform people:
ACTIONS FOR HIGH NET WORTH INDIVIDUALS [20]

NEW MODULE IS UP: About ACTIVATING CELEBRITIES [21] in the election oversight issue:

Candidates in three states have already notified us that they are already making use of the module to help CANDIDATES [22] protect their own elections (The toolkit just went up a few days ago!):

It's time for you to recognize your own power. You don't need us. You don't have to find someone to follow. When you use these tools things will happen. Pick any module. Pick a single action in it. See it to its completion. You've just opened the door to an unexpected evolution of citizenship, the likes of which have not been seen for a long, long time.

"Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." – Declaration of Independence

You may notice that the order of the Citizen's Tool Kit modules has changed. Select actions from any of the following, depending on your interests and skill sets:

MOBILIZATION MODULES
Module 1: Have a House Party
Module 2: Organize a Town Meeting
Module 3: Give a Speech to a Group

CREATIVE & SPECIALTY MODULES
Module 4: Be the Media
Module 5: Adopt a Public Official
Module 6: Check Out the Money Trail: Who's Getting Paid?
Module 7: Find Out If Officials Following the Rules

HARD CORE EVIDENCE MODULES
Module 8: Get Public Records and Freedom of Information Documents
Module 9: Adopt Part of an Election: Watch the System Testing
Module 10: Adopt Part of an Election: Watch Voter Registration Lists
Module 11: Adopt Part of an Election: Become a Poll Worker or Elections Judge
Module 12: Adopt Part of an Election: Monitor the Voting
Module 13: Adopt Part of an Election: Monitor the Counting
Module 14: Adopt Part of an Election: Watch the Chain of Custody
Module 15: Adopt Part of an Election: Audit for Accuracy
Module 16: Legal Actions

'PLAN B' MODULE
Module 17: Count the Votes Yourself

MODULES FOR CANDIDATES, CELEBRITIES, AND WEALTHY CITIZENS
Module 18: Candidates: How to Protect Your Election
Module 19: For Famous Voices (Action ideas for Celebrities)
Module 20: Actions for High Net Worth Individuals

Be part of the solution: Please sign up for the NATIONAL HAND COUNT REGISTRY: http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-profile.cgi?action=register

Black Box Voting is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501c(3) elections watchdog group supported entirely by citizen donations. We refuse funds from any vendor or vested interest.

To support Black Box Voting: click to http://www.blackboxvoting.org/donate.html or send to:
Black Box Voting / 330 SW 43rd St Suite K / PMB 547 / Renton WA 98055

Beware These Voter Suppression and Vote-Counting Fraud Tactics



THE DIRTY 30 OF ELECTION FRAUD

30 WAYS TO STEAL AN ELECTION AND DESTROY DEMOCRACY

This series written, produced and hosted by Network of Citizens at http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/index.htm [23]




(1) Voter Fraud vs. Election Fraud: New Poll Taxes [24]

(2) 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) [25]

(3) Voting Machine Vendors Policing Themselves [26]

(4) Sproul Registration Drives [27]

(5) Voter Rolls Purged I [28]

(6) Voter Rolls Purged II - Accenture [29]

(7) New Laws Discouraging Voter Registration Drives [30]

(8) Secret Software Programs - I [31]

(9) Secret Software Programs - II (Chuck Hagel) [32]

(10) Paperless E-voting Machines (Ney & Abramoff) [33]

(11) Partisan SOS 2000 - Katherine Harris [34]

(12) Partisan SOS 2004 - J. Kenneth Blackwell [35]

(13) Absentee Ballots [36]

(14) Diebold Felons [37]

(15) Provisional Ballots Rejected [38]

(16) Caging Lists [39]

(17) Expatriate Americans [40]

(18) Sleepovers [41]

(19) Mighty Texas Strike Force [42]

(20) Phone Jamming [43]

(21) Voting While Black [44]

(22) Machine Shortages [45]

(23) Spoiled Ballots [46]

(24) Exit Polls [47]

(25) Premature Calling of Election Winners [48]

(26) Rigged Recounts [49]

(27) Judicial Decisions - I (2000 - Supreme Court) [50]

(28) Judicial Decisions - II (Bilbray/Busby; Washoe Co., NV) [51]

(29) Media Blackout [52]

(30) Election Day [53]









(1) Voter Fraud vs. Election Fraud: New Poll Taxes

Voter fraud is fraud perpetrated by individual voters, such as voting by
illegal immigrants and voting more than once, both of which are felonies.
The theory that voter registration drives lead to voter fraud
is false. All sound evidence shows that voter registration drives do
NOT lead to fraud by the voters at the polls. In addition, the notion
that there are widespread occurrences of voter fraud is a myth. Not only is
there a “massive void of evidence”, the existing evidence clearly shows
that it is almost nonexistent, including voting by illegal immigrants.
After all, why would illegal
immigrants take the high risk of publicizing their presence by
registering to vote? Unfortunately, when something is repeated
often enough, even pure propaganda, it can take on the ring of truth.




Furthermore, the great efforts being undertaken to prevent the nonexistent
problem of voter fraud take the focus off of the very real and heavily
documented acts of widespread election fraud that have made a mockery
out of the democratic process of voting in America.



Election fraud ,
is fraud perpetrated by political candidates, parties or others
with a vested interest in the election outcome.
Tactics employed in election fraud include voter supression and
disenfranchisement, stuffing of ballot boxes, and manipulation of the
election results. Such tactics can often be done on a massive scale.


Rather than addressing large-scale election fraud at the national level,
Congress has chosen to focus on developing new laws that would serve to
expand voter suppression and disenfranchisement. An example is the recent
bill in the US House of Representatives, the Federal Election Integrity
Act of 2006 (HR 4844). The voter identifcation requirements imposed by
such legislation serve as a strong reminder of the poll taxes imposed
by many Southern states in the 1950s to prevent poor and black Americans
from voting.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[54]









(2) 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA)



On Oct. 29, 2002, President Bush signed the Help America Vote Act.
The stated intent of HAVA was to correct many of the problems that
occurred in the 2000 election. In the 2004 election, people felt calmed
by the illusion that the problems of the 2000 election were being corrected —
while in fact the opposite was happening. Touch screen voting machines were
touted by the industry and their lobbyists as making voting as easy and reliable
as withdrawing cash from an ATM. Congress, swiftly authorized $3.9 million to
upgrade the nation's election systems, with much of the money devoted to
installing electronic voting machines in each of America's 180,000 precincts.
But as midterm elections approach this November, electronic voting machines
are making things worse instead of better.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[55]







(3) Voting Machine Vendors Policing Themselves




According to Brian Hancock, of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and
Jorge Martinez of the U.S. Election Justice Department, there is NO federal
agency with regulatory authority over the elections industry; there are NO
government standards or restrictions on who can sell or service voting machines
and systems; and there is NO agency or organization that even has a complete
list of voting machine companies in the U.S. In other words, the highly-partisan
voting machine companies are literally policing themselves.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[56]








(4) Sproul Registration Drives



Sproul & Associates is a Republican consulting firm run by
Nathan Sproul, former head of the Arizona Republican Party and Arizona
Christian Coalition. The firm was hired by the RNC for work in swing
states and elsewhere from September 2004 through election day, to
register new voters. Sproul registration drives were reported in
Pennsylvania, Oregon, Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio, Florida and Nevada.
Tactics reported by former Sproul employees included; recruiting
workers by fraudulently telling applicants that they would be working
for America Votes—a legitimate non-partisan operation; telling workers
that if they brought back a bunch of Democratic cards, they would be
fired; destroying registration forms filled out by Democrats &
Independents; and tricking Democrats & Independents into
registering as Republicans. In total, the RNC paid Sproul &
Associates $8.3 million for their efforts—making it the eighth largest
expenditure of the 2004 campaign.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[57]







(5) Voter Rolls Purged I



Of all the strategies used in Florida in the 2000 election, the
most notorious was the systematic use of overly inclusive scrub lists,
intending to purge ex-felons from the voter rolls but actually to
disinfranchise as many Democrats—in particular, African-Americans—as
possible. Katherine Harris, through a list compiled by DBT/Choicepoint,
named as felons tens of thousands of Floridians with clean records,
just because they shared a name or and address, with someone who had
done hard time. Harris's office then purged the rolls of all those on
the list, over 90,000 citizens, most of them entirely innocent. Nearly
3 percent of Florida's eligible black voters were listed.
DBT/ChoicePoint's error rate was 97%.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[58]







(6) Voter Rolls Purged II - Accenture



The issue returned again to prominence in 2004 when Florida
announced another planned purge, again based on a list of felons.
Accenture, a $14 billion company that has made millions doing
government jobs, was supposed to help Florida create a bulletproof
felon voter list. But state elections officials scrapped the list after
newspaper reports reported a flaw that invalidated it.The demise of the
list, which was three years in the making, renews questions about
Accenture's strong Republican ties and its business practices. In fact,
the company's resume is littered with connections to drama that the
nation's Republican leadership would rather forget: Enron, Abu Ghraib
and mysterious Saudi businessmen. The company, once part of Enron's
accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, jettisoned the Andersen name in 2001
to distance itself from scandal.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[59]









(7) New Laws Discouraging Voter Registration Drives



A number of states are adopting rules that make it hard, and
financially perilous, for nonpartisan groups to register new voters.
The Florida Legislature recently adopted a law imposing fines of $250
for every voter registration form that a group files more than 10 days
after it is collected, and $5,000 for every form that is not submitted,
even if it is because of events beyond anyone's control, like a
hurricane. The Florida League of Women Voters, which is suing to block
the new rules, has decided it cannot afford to keep registering new
voters in the state as it has done for 67 years. If a volunteer lost
just 16 forms in a flood, or handed in a stack of forms a day late, the
group's entire annual budget could be put at risk.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[60]









(8) Secret Software Programs - I



The United States is one of only a handful of major democracies that allow private, partisan
companies to secretly count and tabulate votes using their own proprietary software. Today, 80
percent of all ballots in the U.S. are tallied by four companies—Diebold, ES&S, Sequioa Voting
Systems and Hart InterCivic. The simple fact is, these machines not only break down regularly,
they are easily compromised—by people inside and outside of the companies.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[61]









(9) Secret Software Programs - II (Chuck Hagel)



In 1995, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska was the CEO of Election Systems
and Software (ES&S), the voting machine company that would count
the votes in his 1996 bid for the U.S. Senate. He was trailing in the
pre-election polls to his opponent, former Gov. Ben Nelson, 65% to 18%,
yet Hagel amazingly came from behind to win with 56% of the vote. He
was the first Republican Senate winner in the state in 24 years. In
both the 1996 and 2002 elections, ES&S counted 85% of the votes in
Nebraska. Senator Hagel retains a $1 - $5 million ownership in
ES&S’s parent company, McCarthy Group, as he contemplates a run for
the Presidency in 2008.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[62]









(10) Paperless E-voting Machines (Ney & Abramoff)



According to an April 2006 article in Rolling Stone Magazine,
“Diebold paid some $275,000 to [Jack] Abramoff’s firm, Greenberg
Traurig, with the apparent aim of keeping legislation requiring paper
trails in the voting process from getting into HAVA. Conveniently,
Abramoff pal [Rep.] Bob Ney [R-OH], one of the HAVA architects, blocked
every attempt to put paper trails into law.” Since then, both Ney and
Abramoff have pled guilty to felony charges of corruption.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[63]









(11) Partisan SOS 2000 - Katherine Harris



Florida SoS Katherine Harris oversaw the 2000 election in Florida
that was awash in purged voter roles, trashed “over-votes,” uncounted
military and absentee ballots, and state financing of republican
campaign efforts. Harris, who also served as co-chair of Bush's Florida
campaign, gleefully purged voter roles of supposed “felons.” Following
Election Day, Harris was instrumental in ensuring that all the Florida
votes were NOT counted.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[64]









(12) Partisan SOS 2004 - J. Kenneth Blackwell


In 2004, J. Kenneth Blackwell was not only Ohio's SoS, but a leader in the Bush reelection campaign.
Under Blackwell’s guidance, Ohio experienced some of the most egregious and un-addressed election
process failures seen to date in the age of computerized voting. Democratic precincts were severely
underserved by voting machinery, forcing voters to wait in lines of up to 10 hours or more simply
to cast their vote. Adjacent precincts of primarily Republican voters were well served, with
sufficient machinery and no waiting. Blackwell is currently a Republican gubernatorial candidate
and, as Secretary of State, in charge of running elections in Ohio.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[65]









(13) Absentee Ballots


Mail-in voter registration forms are protected by federal law—absentee ballots are not.
According to Palast, the number of absentee ballots has quintupled in many states,
with the number rejected on technical grounds rising to over a half a million (526,420)
in 2004. In swing states, absentee ballot shredding was pandemic. Absentee Ballots explained [66]

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[67]







(14) Diebold Felons

According
to Bev Harris of Black Box Voting, managers of a subsidiary of Diebold,
one of the country's largest voting equipment vendors, include a
convicted cocaine trafficker, a man who conducted fraudulent stock
transactions, and a softwareprogrammer convicted of falsifying computer
records.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[68]









(15) Provisional Ballots Rejected

Introduced
by federal law in 2002 as part of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), the
provisional ballot was designed especially for voters of color.
Initially proposed by the Congressional Black Caucus to save the rights
of those wrongly purged from voter rolls, it was, in swing states,
twisted into a back-of-the-bus ballot unlikely to be tallied.
Provisional Ballots explained [69]

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[70]









(16) Caging Lists

This
particularly mean-spirited practice is designed to eliminate specific
segments of the population from the voting roles. A classic example was
during the 2004 presidential election when the Republican National
Committee took the time and expense to send registered mailings to the
soldier residents of an entire military base, Jacksonville Navel Air
Station, in Florida. Not surprisingly, the mailings were returned to
the RNC, unsigned by the addressees, since the base’s soldiers had been
deployed overseas. RNC officials marched to election offices and
challenged the validity of the soldiers’ voter registrations. En masse,
the names of the soldiers were dropped from the voting roles. They were
only allowed to vote via provisional ballots.... which would ultimately
not be counted.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[71]









(17) Expatriate Americans

Expatriate
America—a global bloc some have called the 51st State—includes up to 7
million voters. In 2002, HAVA instructed the Department of Defense to
amplify a federal website (fvap.gov) to serve as a comprehensive
nonpartisan clearinghouse of voting information. On August 23, 2004,
the website suddenly went down just when the requests to register for
the Presidential election were at their highest.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[72]









(18) Sleepovers

The
concept of the “sleepover “ first received widespread national
attention after the CA House District (HD) 50 special election in July
2006. The term “sleepover” actually refers to the act of pollworkers
taking the election machinery home with them prior to the election, in
some cases for longer than a week. In the close HD 50 race, in which
Francine Busby lost to Brian Bilbrary, Diebold voting machines were
taken home by pollworkers. San Diego County Registrar Mike Haas
defended the process, noting that taking machinery home had been
typical procedure for almost 40 years.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[73]







(19) Mighty Texas Strike Force

In
2004, the Mighty Texas Strike Force, an off-shoot of the RNC, dispersed
about 1,500 volunteers to key battleground states to make phone calls
to people recently released from prison, threatening them with being
reported to the FBI and returning to jail if they voted.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[74]









(20) Phone Jamming

On
Election Day in November, 2002, the New Hampshire Democratic Party
found itself suddenly unable to operate its phone lines in its GOTV
efforts for the close Senate race between Democratic Gov. Jeanne
Shaheen and Republican John Sununu. It was later discovered that the
phone lines were maliciously jammed by operatives connected to the
Republican Party. Although the perpetrators of the jamming were
convicted of their crimes, their goal was attained. The Democrat’s
later inability to contact their voters during the critical GOTV effort
had an impact on the election; Shaheen lost a close election. Civil
suits continue regarding this case, and disclosures reveal a close
connection between the perpetrators and the White House.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[75]







(21) Voting While Black

Almost
40 years after enactment of the historic Voting Rights Act, many
Americans are still subjected to threats and intimidation when they try
to exercise their right to vote. Although voter intimidation is a
federal crime, most violators are never punished because federal
prosecutors do not pursue these cases.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[76]







(22) Machine Shortages

Unequal
distribution of voting machines has allowed partisan election officials
to effectively deny people the right to vote. Voters in heavily
Democratic districts faced massive lines due to insufficient machines,
requiring voters to stand in line for hours before being able to cast
their vote. In addition, these locations were often supplied with
older, malfunctioning machines.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[77]









(23) Spoiled Ballots

The
nasty little secret of American democracy is that, in every national
election, ballots cast are simply thrown in the garbage—over a million
of them. Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with
implementing election reforms, "as many as 1 million ballots were
spoiled [in the 2004 election] by faulty voting equipment – roughly one
for every 100 cast."

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[78]







(24) Exit Polls

Historically,
exit polls have proven to be very accurate, often to within ½ of 1%
(0.005). Discrepancies between exit polls and the final vote counts is
solid evidence that something in the election results is wrong.
According to computer security expert Chuck Herrin, “the sudden
unreliability of exit polls in the U.S. coincides with the use of
paperless electronic voting machines.”

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[79]







(25) Premature Calling of Election Winners



In the early morning hours of November 8, Fox News Channel declared that the pivotal state of Florida had
gone for George W. Bush. At 2:16 a.m. Fox announced that the Texas governor had won the state, thus securing
the 271 electoral votes needed to win the presidential election. The other television networks followed suit
in a matter of minutes. The call was subsequently withdrawn.The individual responsible for recommending that
Fox call Florida for Bush was John Ellis, who led the network's decision desk. Ellis was not a disinterested
party in the presidential election, but the first cousin of the Republican candidate and his brother, Florida
Governor Jeb Bush. In response to the call by the networks Al Gore telephoned Bush to concede the election.
But as Gore was on his way to deliver his concession speech, the vice president's advisors urged him to turn
back, telling him Bush's lead had dropped to only several thousand votes. Gore phoned Bush rescinding his
concession after the networks reversed their call, putting Florida back in the undecided category.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[80]









(26) Rigged Recounts

Sherole
Eaton, Deputy Director of Elections for Hocking County, Ohio testified
in a signed and notarized affidavit regarding the 2004 presidential
election recount that: A Michael Barbian, Jr., a representative of the
voting machine company Triad GSI, unilaterally sought and obtained
access to the voting machinery and records in Hocking County Ohio,
modified the computer tabulator, learned which precinct was planned to
be the subject of the initial test recount and made further alterations
based on that information, and advised the election officials how to
manipulate the machinery so that the preliminary hand recount matched
the original machine count.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[81]









(27) Judicial Decisions - I (2000 - Supreme Court)

The
Supreme Court's ruling in Bush vs. Gore, which stopped the Florida
recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush, was one of most
controversial rulings in the court's history. According to Alan
Dershowitz, "The decision may be ranked as the single most corrupt
decision in Supreme Court history, because it is the only one that I
know of where the majority justices decided as they did because of the
personal identity and political affiliation of the litigants ... No
honest person can any longer trust them to do justice, as distinguished
from politics."







(28) Judicial Decisions - II (Bilbray/Busby; Washoe Co., NV)

In
the CA House District (HD) 50 July 2006 Special Election, Republican
Brian Bilbray won a close victory over Democrat Francine Busby. But the
issue of “sleepovers” prompted local election reform activist, to file
a citizen’s challenge to the election, citing the violation of CA
certification rules. Immediately after the election, and before the
election was certified, Brian Bilbray was whisked off to Washington,
D.C. and sworn into the office by Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert.
The San Diego District Court Judge declined to hear the citizen’s case,
citing that the court lacked jurisdiction, since Bilbray was already
sworn in as a U.S. Representative.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[82]







(29) Media Blackout


The Telecommunications Act of 1996 makes it possible for one company to
dominate 35% of a national TV market and on the local level to own 40%
of radio stations. As a result, media corporations are gobbling up
smaller and independent stations. The result is censorship by omission
as commercial and partisan concerns overwhelm democratic values. The
mainstream media’s response to any request to cover election fraud
stories is to shut up and get over it.

Click here for more News and Articles on this topic...

[83]







(30) Election Day


Check back on Election Day for the breaking news on election fraud.







Contact Us by email: info at networkofcitizens.org



Home [84]



Save-R-Vote Election Monitoring Field Guide

This is the thoroughly documented and illustrated guide to election day monitoring by the Sav R Vote project in Riverside County, CA.

Based on the field-tested experience of one of best election-monitoring groups in the nation, this guide provides how-to instructions on everything you need to know to organize and conduct an election day monitoring program in your home county.

Although the legal citations in this guide refer to the California Election Code, and the voting system in Riverside County is the Sequoia Edge DRE, the general principles, methods, and model checklists offered in this guide are highly transferrable and adaptable to the monitoring of electronic voting systems anywhere.

The entire report is available as a 1.2 MB PDF download.Click this link [85] to save the report to your computer's hard drive.

SAVE R VOTE Election Day Notebook
Table of Contents

Introduction to the Project
Title Page
Purpose – Overview
Chain of Custody
Election Eve Set-Up
Election Night Closing
Election Results Report
Transporting Ballots to Collection Site
Collection Station
Observing
Following to Gateway (ROV)
Election Day Observations
Opening
Set-Up
First Voter
Throughout the day
Ballot: Card Activator, Activator Card, Provisional, and Paper
DRE: Card stuck, calibration, security tape, and yellow button
Printer: Paper jam (out of alignment) and used all paper
Observation Report Forms (extras)
Additional Information


Join Pollworkers for Democracy


Pollworkers for Democracy
[86]

State Open Records Law Request Letter Generator

Fully Automated, Fill-in-the-Blanks State Open Records Law Request Letter Generator [87]
CLICK the above Link to open the Letter Generator

A quote from the site:

Welcome to the Student Press Law Center's nationally recognized, automated open records law letter generator! Since its launch in 1997, our unique letter generator has been used tens of thousands of times to assist student journalists and other citizens obtain access to public records maintained by state or local government officials. The Student Press Law Center is happy to provide our letter generator free of charge as a public service.

"We're Counting the Votes" Kit

"We're counting the Votes" is a detailed guide to conducting elections the time-=honored way:

with voter marked paper ballots, handcounted in the precincts on election night.

Click this link to go to the Kit overview and download page: http://electiondefensealliance.org/were_counting_the_votes_kit [88]

Based on contemporary practice in one-fourth of the voting jurisdictions of New Hampshire, and written by Nancy Tobi, EDA Legislative Coordinator and leading national proponent of hand-counted election procedures.

Also see the companion HCPB manual for election administrators, and hand-count instructional videos, at our Hand Counted Paper Ballot section of this website: http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/topics/hcpb [89]


New Progressive Coalition Fundraising Press Kit

http://www.newprogressivecoalition.com/files/npc-online-press-kit.pdf [90]

CA Election Monitoring --A Training Manual


One American. One Vote. Counted As Cast.
An Election Monitoring Training Manual
[91]
by Michelle Gabriel

Michelle Gabriel of the Voting Rights Task Force of Alameda County, CA
has compiled a training handbook for election monitoring based on CA
election code, and borrowing ideas from the BlackboxVoting Toolkit, the SAV R VOTE
(Riverside Co.) Election Monitoring Report, the DFA-NH report "We're Counting the Votes," and other sources -- and her own experience as a pollworker and election observor.

The site includes sections for Security, Testing, Companies, Audits, Procedures, Accessibility, Registration, and Monitoring.

DOWNLOAD THE MANUAL AND OTHER RESOURCES HERE
PDF [92] | DOC [93]

GUIDE TO ESTABLISHING A POLLWATCHING GROUP [94]

WE'RE COUNTING THE VOTES [95]

This is a work open to revision, and your comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged. See below for the Table of Contents.

Michelle is seeking monitors for the CA 11th Congressional District. The 11th District covers portions of four counties in CA and is shaping up to be one of the most
contested House races in California this November 7.

Michelle is on the EDA Election Monitoring E-mail list.
You can communicate with her and other members of the EDA Election Monitoring Working Group by subscribing to the E-mail list for this Working Group.

Look for the Discussion List heading in the top left corner of pages
in the Forums section of the EDA website.

Follow that link to the subscription page for the EDA working Groups. Select Monitoring from the displayed list of EDA Group lists, and follow the subscription instructions.

CA Election Monitoring Guide

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What can I observe -- summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Who can observe -- summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
What can I reconcile -- summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Pre-observing preparation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
What can I observe -- detail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Before the Election:

Observing preparation and operation
of tabulation devices programming, and testing . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Observing logic and accuracy testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Observing absentee ballot processing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Pollworker training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Observing poll set up. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

During the Voting

Observing voting at the polls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Observing poll close. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
After the Polls Close
Observing chain of custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Observing central counting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Observe 1% manual tally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
What can I reconcile -- detail. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Prioritizing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

Election Codes for Observing and Monitoring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Election Codes for Reconcile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Examples of problems caught. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
How do I report an incident . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

Communication and Framing Tools

These are helpful tips, charts, linguistic or graphic tools, articles to help you transcend the partisan rhetoric and get people talking about the civic issue of our election integrity crisis.

Conservative Empathy

Conservative Empathy [96]

Myth Breakers (Brief)

Myth Breakers in brief [97]

Myth Breakers (Full)

Myth Breakers [98]

Questions to Ask Your Election Official

E-voting questions [99]

Twenty Amazing Facts

Twenty Amazing Facts [100]

Get the Solarbus DVD featuring the Lou Dobbs "Democracy at Risk" Series!

Get the FREE DVD: Lou Dobbs' Democracy at Risk DVD from SolarBus!

We hear it all the time -- "If all this is really going on with our election system, why isn't the media talking about it? Surely there are some good reporters out there who would want to expose the problems with electronic voting, if it's as bad as you say."

Well we have an answer for those questions now. It IS as bad as we say, and the media IS covering it. And better yet, we can hand them a free copy of this DVD and let them see for themselves!

Lou Dobbs does the 6:00 pm new on CNN, primetime on "the most respected name in news." So when they cover a story, it's not by mistake. And when they cover a story over 20 times in the last couple months, they are obviously showing their concern about a very important topic.

Many of the CNN segments on this DVD can also be viewed online in our Multimedia Room

Those who watch Lou Dobbs on CNN know that occasionally he will latch on to an issue and keep covering it until it's resolved, because of its importance to our nation. As an example, Lou has been focusing attention on the lack of border security for months if not years. His focus on this issue has helped force legislators and voters to address the problems at the border and today there is legislation pending in Congress to do just that.

In a similar way, the regular segment "Democracy at Risk" on Lou's show has tenaciously reported on the severe problems with electronic voting - the lack of security on the systems, the unacceptable error rate on the machines, and the questionable practices of the private companies who make them. Every time a new independent study exposes problems with the machines, or an actual election experiences trouble (which is quite often), Lou and Kitty Pilgrim, a regular journalist on his program, are there to report it to the American people.

Lou and Kitty deserve a lot of credit for being the only ones in the "mainstream" media for reporting on this. Those of us in the "other" media salute them for helping inform the public on this issue that is vital to our democracy. Their coverage has given more credibility and recognition to our ongoing fight for open and fair elections.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION [101]

Learn the Basics

http://www.votingmachinesprocon.org/ [102]

VotersUnite "Information to Work With"

Information to Work With [103]
VotersUnite.org has consistently produced some of the very best original research and outstanding public education materials of the election integrity movement. Click the link above to visit the VotersUnite collection.

Explore Resources

Click this link EDA Resources [104] and learn more about the election integrity crisis in our country.

All content on this site © 2006 by each individual author, All Rights Reserved.

Election Defense Alliance is a program of International Humanities Center, a nonprofit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the IRS Code.

Fair Use Policy | Original Site created by Jenni Simonis

Site Meter


Source URL (retrieved on 2008/05/15 - 20:49): http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/citizen_activism_tools

Links:
[1] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?list=type&type=73
[2] mailto:observer@verifiedvoting.org
[3] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardState.pdf
[4] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[5] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/Pre-electionLAQ.pdf
[6] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[7] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[8] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardState.pdf
[9] https://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/EarlyVotingQ.pdf
[10] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[11] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[12] http://www.verifiedvoting.org/audits
[13] http://www.verifiedvoting.org/downloads/ManualAudits-06-06.pdf
[14] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardState.pdf
[15] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[16] http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/ETScorecardLocal.pdf
[17] mailto:observer@verifiedvoting.org
[18] http://www.blackboxvoting.org/toolkit.pdf
[19] http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html
[20] http://www.blackboxvoting.org/toolkit-affluent.pdf
[21] http://www.blackboxvoting.org/toolkit-celebrities.pdf
[22] http://www.blackboxvoting.org/toolkit-candidates.pdf
[23] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/index.htm
[24] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(1)
[25] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(2)
[26] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(3)
[27] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(4)
[28] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(5)
[29] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(6)
[30] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(7)
[31] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(8)
[32] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(9)
[33] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(10)
[34] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(11)
[35] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(12)
[36] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(13)
[37] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(14)
[38] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(15)
[39] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(16)
[40] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(17)
[41] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(18)
[42] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(19)
[43] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(20)
[44] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(21)
[45] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(22)
[46] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(23)
[47] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(24)
[48] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(25)
[49] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(26)
[50] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(27)
[51] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(28)
[52] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(29)
[53] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/30ways.htm#(30)
[54] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day1.htm
[55] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day2.htm
[56] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day3.htm
[57] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day4.htm
[58] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day5.htm
[59] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day5.htm
[60] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day7.htm
[61] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day8.htm
[62] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day9.htm
[63] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day10.htm
[64] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day11.htm
[65] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day11.htm
[66] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/AbsenteeBallots.pdf
[67] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day13.htm
[68] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day14.htm
[69] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/ProvisionalBallots.pdf
[70] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day15.htm
[71] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day16.htm
[72] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day17.htm
[73] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day18.htm
[74] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day19.htm
[75] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day20.htm
[76] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day21.htm
[77] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day22.htm
[78] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day23.htm
[79] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day24.htm
[80] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day25.htm
[81] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day26.htm
[82] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day28.htm
[83] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/Dirty30_day29.htm
[84] http://www.networkofcitizens.org/election/index.htm
[85] http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/
[86] http://themmob.org/pollworkers/
[87] http://www.splc.org/foiletter.asp
[88] http://electiondefensealliance.org/were_counting_the_votes_kit
[89] http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/topics/hcpb
[90] http://www.newprogressivecoalition.com/files/npc-online-press-kit.pdf
[91] http://www.countedascast.com/monitoring.php
[92] http://electiondefensealliance.org/files/ElectionMonitoringV1.0_0.pdf
[93] http://electiondefensealliance.org/files/ElectionMonitoring
[94] http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Guide_to_establishing_a_pollwatching_group
[95] http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/
[96] http://www.chuckherrin.com/ConservativeEmpathy.htm
[97] http://www.votersunite.org/info/ElectronicVotingInBrief.pdf
[98] http://www.votersunite.org/
[99] http://www.chuckherrin.com/evotingquestions.htm
[100] http://nightweed.com/usavotefacts.html
[101] http://www.solarbus.org/election/dvd/
[102] http://www.votingmachinesprocon.org/
[103] http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/
[104] http://electiondefensealliance.org/resources